IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Stachiw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Calgary Royals AJHL 55 1 3 4 0.073 0.0244 0.0253 0.0673 0.0698
2008-09 Calgary Royals AJHL 40 2 8 10 0.250 0.0838 0.0834 0.2314 0.2304
2009-10 Canmore Eagles AJHL 52 3 8 11 0.211 0.0709 0.0670 0.1957 0.1848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23479
Defenseman overall
#1858
Defenseman born in 1989
#2481
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Anna
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Burgmeier
Concordia · 2015-16
0.120 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Éric David
Elmira · 2010-11
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.