IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Anna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Canterbury NE-Prep 27 2 2 4 0.148 0.0293 0.0293 0.0675 0.0675
2021-22 WB/Scranton Knights USPHL-Premier 43 31 34 65 1.512 0.1977 0.1976 0.5130 0.5128
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 50 13 15 28 0.560 0.2283 0.2204 0.4501 0.4344
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 21 1 6 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · SUNY Cortland
+84.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14055
Forward overall
#714
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Camille Marcoux
Western New England · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dondre Watson
Marian · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Gauld
Canton · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.