IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caelum Dick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.0766 0.0766 0.2139 0.2139
2021-22 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 58 10 22 32 0.552 0.1831 0.1921 0.5113 0.5363
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 57 4 11 15 0.263 0.1618 0.1582 0.7754 0.7583
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 2 10 12 0.203 0.1250 0.1160 0.5993 0.5563
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 19 0 5 5 0.263
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 25 1 7 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Alaska Fairbanks
+155.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10665
Defenseman overall
#2260
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Scurfield
Lawrence · 2008-09
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Dillon
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Costello
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.