← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-06-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 52 2 17 19 0.365 0.1226 0.1327 0.3381 0.3659
2010-11 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 52 8 13 21 0.404 0.1354 0.1394 0.3737 0.3848
2011-12 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 57 8 18 26 0.456 0.1530 0.1498 0.4221 0.4132
2012-13 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 53 14 29 43 0.811 0.2721 0.2524 0.7508 0.6965
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 2 12 14 0.538
2015-16 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 25 5 12 17 0.680
2014-15 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 25 4 3 7 0.280
2013-14 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 21 2 2 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2013-14 · Manhattanville
+5.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28341
Forward overall
#1057
Forward born in 1992
#852
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.