← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Bischoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 20 10 7 17 0.850 0.2288 0.2288 0.2065 0.2065
2020-21 Grand Rapids USHS-MN 18 13 13 26 1.444 0.3888 0.3888 0.3508 0.3508
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 56 13 23 36 0.643 0.2547 0.2643 0.6750 0.7004
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 55 4 6 10 0.182 0.1118 0.1056 0.5356 0.5060
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 28 7 9 16 0.571
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA JR 35 10 13 23 0.657
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA SO 26 4 4 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · Augustana
+112.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25178
Forward overall
#1401
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2003-04
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.