IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Grahme Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 21 11 15 26 1.238 0.1567 0.1567 0.3007 0.3007
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 12 2 4 6 0.500 0.1837 0.2025 0.5278 0.5819
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 38 4 5 9 0.237 0.1397 0.1411 0.7112 0.7182
2023-24 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 53 23 39 62 1.170 0.4298 0.4323 1.2347 1.2417
2024-25 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 36 13 13 26 0.722 0.2783 0.2605 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15626
Forward overall
#753
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2017-18
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chandler Madry
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.