← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kris Spriggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 47 10 12 22 0.468 0.1199 0.1267 0.3529 0.3730
2014-15 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 55 19 37 56 1.018 0.2609 0.2621 0.7675 0.7710
2015-16 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 34 20 14 34 1.000 0.3354 0.3158 0.9254 0.8713
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Niagara D1 AHA SR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2018-19 Niagara D1 AHA JR 35 6 4 10 0.286
2017-18 Niagara D1 AHA SO 22 6 2 8 0.364
2016-17 Niagara D1 AHA FR 35 9 7 16 0.457
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Niagara
+81.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13876
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 1995
#210
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.