← New Search ↗ Social Card

B.J. Duffin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 AJHL 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.0805 0.0815 0.2221 0.2247
2013-14 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 12 20 32 0.552 0.1850 0.1776 0.5105 0.4901
2014-15 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 55 9 17 26 0.473 0.1585 0.1437 0.4374 0.3967
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 31 4 9 13 0.419
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 4 9 13 0.419
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 24 1 4 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+54.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37342
Forward overall
#1470
Forward born in 1994
#1343
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.