| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | — | AJHL | 50 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.240 | 0.0805 | 0.0815 | 0.2221 | 0.2247 |
| 2013-14 | Olds Grizzlys | AJHL | 58 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 0.552 | 0.1850 | 0.1776 | 0.5105 | 0.4901 |
| 2014-15 | Olds Grizzlys | AJHL | 55 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 0.473 | 0.1585 | 0.1437 | 0.4374 | 0.3967 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D1 | BigTen | SR | 31 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.419 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SR | 31 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.419 |
| 2017-18 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | JR | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 |
| 2016-17 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | SO | 23 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2015-16 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | D3 | BigTen | FR | 24 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.208 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.