← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Longacre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 50 1 5 6 0.120 0.0708 0.0781 0.3604 0.3977
2023-24 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.1002 0.1082
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 1 10 11 0.177 0.1046 0.1049 0.5328 0.5343
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 47 5 15 20 0.425 0.1639 0.1627 0.6192 0.6147
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13109
Defenseman overall
#2442
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2008-09
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2010-11
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2023-24
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.