← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Longacre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 50 1 5 6 0.120 0.0708 0.0781 0.3601 0.3974
2023-24 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 50 5 8 13 0.260 0.1002 0.1082 — —
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 62 1 10 11 0.177 0.1046 0.1049 0.5323 0.5338
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 47 5 15 20 0.425 0.1639 0.1627 0.6188 0.6144
2026-27 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 6 1 4 5 0.833 0.3211 0.3211 1.2120 1.2120
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13303
Defenseman overall
#2470
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NCDC 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2016-17
0.44
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2018-19
0.40
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2021-22
0.06
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2023-24
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2018-19
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.