← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Spitznagel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Colorado College
Verbal NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 2 1 3 0.125 0.0737 0.0808 0.3754 0.4117
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 62 3 6 9 0.145 0.0857 0.0897 0.4361 0.4566
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 50 10 8 18 0.360 0.2124 0.2115 1.0812 1.0768
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.2121 0.2004 0.9422 0.8901
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30369
Forward overall
#1597
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
BCHL 2017-18
0.12
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
CCHL 2015-16
0.18
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

St. Olaf · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2008-09
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.