← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Spitznagel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Colorado College
Verbal NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 24 2 1 3 0.125 0.0737 0.0808 0.3751 0.4114
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 62 3 6 9 0.145 0.0857 0.0897 0.4357 0.4562
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 50 10 8 18 0.360 0.2124 0.2115 1.0803 1.0759
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.2121 0.2004 0.9602 0.9071
2026-27 Ottawa 67's OHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0964 0.0964 0.4365 0.4365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30785
Forward overall
#1630
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
BCHL 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2013-14
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.