IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pavol Funtek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-03 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0737 0.0707 0.3754 0.3599
2023-24 Minot Minotauros NAHL 45 2 11 13 0.289 0.1061 0.1013 0.3049 0.2910
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 17 1 1 2 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Alaska Anchorage
+39.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18096
Defenseman overall
#3203
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Roethke
Concordia · 2024-25
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Robinson
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Baird
Utica · 2010-11
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.