IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh McKechney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Brooks Bandits AJHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3354 0.3591 0.9254 0.9909
2015-16 Brooks Bandits AJHL 59 17 30 47 0.797 0.2672 0.2737 0.7372 0.7551
2016-17 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 16 51 67 1.117 0.3745 0.3654 1.0334 1.0082
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC GR 40 14 13 27 0.675
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 22 7 6 13 0.591
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 35 3 4 7 0.200
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 36 4 11 15 0.417
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 40 5 12 17 0.425
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2017-18 · Colgate
+51.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13917
Forward overall
#628
Forward born in 1997
#212
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Jay Dickman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Dougan
New England College · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Kaminski
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.