IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacen Bracko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Calgary Canucks AJHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0838 0.0872 0.2314 0.2409
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 22 2 6 8 0.364
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2020-21 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Concordia (MN) D1 — JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 24 6 4 10 0.417
2019-20 Concordia (MN) D1 — SO 24 6 4 10 0.417
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 9 6 15 0.577
2018-19 Concordia (MN) D1 — FR 26 9 6 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2018-19 · Concordia
+673.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kasper Kjellkvist
Curry · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.