IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Risk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 26 0 5 5 0.192 0.0645 0.0651 0.1782 0.1798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 24 5 12 17 0.708
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 25 4 19 23 0.920
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 3 1 2 3 1.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2019-20 · Albertus Magnus
+536.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15884
Defenseman overall
#2609
Defenseman born in 1999
#1823
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Parks
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin O'Donnell
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Lefkof
New England College · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.