← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nic Herringer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Calgary Canucks AJHL 13 2 5 7 0.538 0.1806 0.1848 0.4991 0.5108
2017-18 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 12 2 0 2 0.167 0.0559 0.0541 0.1545 0.1494
2018-19 Calgary Canucks AJHL 60 17 16 33 0.550 0.1845 0.1695 0.5097 0.4682
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Canton D3 SR 25 10 9 19 0.760
2022-23 Canton D3 SR 25 6 12 18 0.720
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 19 0 2 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2019-20 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-0.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38194
Forward overall
#1973
Forward born in 1998
#1411
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.