IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-29 Country: USA
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 12 2 0 2 0.167 0.0559 0.0571 0.1542 0.1575
2017-18 Mid Cities Jr. Stars NA3HL 6 2 3 5 0.833 0.1062 0.1036 0.2636 0.2571
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57201
Forward overall
#3217
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gavin Best
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Austin Kamer
BCHL 2015-16
0.07
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Tommy Apap
USHL 2015-16
0.13
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Cole Burke
NAHL 2023-24
0.50
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Sheehan
Hamline · 2017-18
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Shane
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.