IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Malboeuf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0983 0.1017 0.5007 0.5180
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 53 4 5 9 0.170 0.1002 0.0987 0.5100 0.5022
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 62 1 11 12 0.194 0.1141 0.1065 0.5812 0.5427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 36 0 7 7 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2025-26 · Colgate
+99.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15190
Defenseman overall
#2887
Defenseman born in 2005
#3715
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrey Manov
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Seitz
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Decker
Norwich · 2002-03
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.