IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Morrow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 41 5 6 11 0.268 0.0900 0.0945 0.2487 0.2610
2018-19 — AJHL 36 5 13 18 0.500 0.1677 0.1679 0.4634 0.4639
2019-20 — AJHL 53 9 21 30 0.566 0.1898 0.1898 0.5246 0.5246
2020-21 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 24 5 14 19 0.792
2023-24 Canton D3 — JR 25 8 13 21 0.840
2022-23 Canton D3 — SO 21 7 11 18 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2022-23 · Canton
+622.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35093
Forward overall
#1834
Forward born in 2000
#1220
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Kim
Babson · 2001-02
1.182 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
St. Mary's · 2004-05
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.