← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Works Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 56 18 11 29 0.518 0.1737 0.1858 0.4792 0.5127
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 43 49 92 1.586 0.5320 0.5320 1.4676 1.4676
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 3 4 0 4 1.333 0.4472 0.4472 1.2336 1.2336
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA GR 31 5 10 15 0.484
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SR 35 10 10 20 0.571
2022-23 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA JR 39 8 9 17 0.436
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2020-21 · Denver
+25.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10555
Forward overall
#481
Forward born in 2001
#119
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.