← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker McRae Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 40 3 8 11 0.275 0.0912 0.0912 0.2549 0.2549
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.0829 0.0829 0.2317 0.2317
2021-22 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 58 6 32 38 0.655 0.2174 0.1996 0.6072 0.5576
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 33 0 2 2 0.061
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 26 0 1 1 0.038
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 27 3 4 7 0.259
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 29 1 3 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Dartmouth
-26.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9207
Defenseman overall
#1838
Defenseman born in 2001
#1396
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.