← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Broda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 16 14 30 0.500 0.1085 0.1085 0.3871 0.3871
2020-21 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0373 0.0373 0.1030 0.1030
2021-22 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 58 25 25 50 0.862 0.2891 0.2867 0.7990 0.7923
2022-23 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 44 24 19 43 0.977 0.3278 0.3088 0.9058 0.8533
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA GR 31 4 15 19 0.613
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 29 7 7 14 0.483
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 28 12 15 27 0.964
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2023-24 · Aurora
+275.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18239
Forward overall
#978
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2014-15
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.