← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0309 0.0309 0.0732 0.0732
2019-20 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 0 4 4 0.154 0.0297 0.0297 0.0704 0.0704
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 43 1 14 15 0.349 0.1170 0.1120 0.3233 0.3096
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 27 2 14 16 0.593
2024-25 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 26 2 5 7 0.269
2023-24 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 26 3 7 10 0.385
2022-23 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 26 2 8 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Babson
+414.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20957
Defenseman overall
#3369
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.