← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Watkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 17 3 7 10 0.588 0.1973 0.1973 0.5442 0.5442
2021-22 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 58 16 23 39 0.672 0.2255 0.2438 0.6221 0.6726
2022-23 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 54 26 41 67 1.241 0.4161 0.4292 1.1479 1.1841
2023-24 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 23 20 43 0.694 0.4091 0.3929 2.0810 1.9987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Minnesota State D1 CCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SO 40 6 17 23 0.575
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 15 2 2 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Nebraska Omaha
-23.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10794
Forward overall
#452
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.