IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lukas Sawchyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-27 Country: Canada
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 60 4 11 15 0.250 0.1475 0.1610 0.7509 0.8198
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 66 15 40 55 0.833 0.4054 0.4201 2.0447 2.1186
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 68 27 61 88 1.294 0.6296 0.6232 3.1753 3.1430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7271
Forward overall
#140
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Beck
OHL 2021-22
0.80
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
John Waldron
USHL 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Ryan Stevens
NAHL 2012-13
0.22
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Benjamin Kevan
USHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.