← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Koering Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-11 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 1 7 8 0.333 0.0897 0.0897 0.0810 0.0810
2021-22 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 6 10 16 0.667 0.1795 0.1795 0.1619 0.1619
2022-23 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 27 6 10 16 0.593 0.1595 0.1595 0.1439 0.1439
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 53 1 14 15 0.283 0.1740 0.1722 0.8338 0.8251
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 36 1 6 7 0.194
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC 30 1 2 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Colorado College
-36.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8771
Defenseman overall
#1974
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2007-08
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2019-20
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.