IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kason Muscutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 53 7 6 13 0.245 0.0901 0.0975 0.2589 0.2801
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 55 6 8 14 0.255 0.1501 0.1484 0.7644 0.7556
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 56 7 10 17 0.304 0.1791 0.1679 0.9118 0.8548
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 29 5 6 11 0.379 0.2237 0.1989 1.1392 1.0130
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 17 3 0 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Michigan
+28.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28272
Forward overall
#1655
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Davis
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.