IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Hafele Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-18 Country: USA
Arizona State
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 49 6 7 13 0.265 0.2110 0.2201 0.9936 1.0363
2024-25 — NTDP-U18 57 11 8 19 0.333 0.2651 0.2640 1.2483 1.2432
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 52 15 27 42 0.808 0.5143 0.5247 2.4204 2.4693
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6346
Forward overall
#179
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

Arizona State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ryan Stevens
NAHL 2012-13
0.22
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Matthew Romer
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Jack Jensen
NAHL 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Arizona State
Benjamin Kevan
USHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Arizona State

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Ford
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Fiorino
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Kalinowski
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.