IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Todd Collins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-08-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Oshawa Legionaires OJHL 46 5 12 17 0.370 0.0906 0.0921 0.2545 0.2588
2006-07 Port Hope Predators OJHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 9 14 23 0.852
2009-10 Marian D3 NCHA JR 27 13 7 20 0.741
2008-09 Marian D3 NCHA SO 25 11 7 18 0.720
2007-08 Marian D3 NCHA FR 28 10 16 26 0.929
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2007-08 · Marian
+1078.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44569
Forward overall
#1459
Forward born in 1987
#3105
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Kreuser
Concordia · 2015-16
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Falk
Augsburg · 2007-08
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Wyatt
Wesleyan · 2014-15
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.