← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mace’o Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-25 Country: USA
2025 · Round 3, Pick #80  ·  Calgary Flames Calgary Flames
Minnesota
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 27 7 15 22 0.815 0.1032 0.1032 0.1978 0.1978
2023-24 — NTDP-U18 51 2 4 6 0.118 0.0874 0.0887 0.4410 0.4476
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 60 2 4 6 0.100 0.0743 0.0719 0.3750 0.3630
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 44 1 10 11 0.250 0.1475 0.1463 0.7502 0.7443
2026-27 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 5 1 2 3 0.600 0.2919 0.2919 1.4656 1.4656
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15661
Defenseman overall
#2059
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
NAHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.55
actual FR PPG at Minnesota
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.72
actual FR PPG at Minnesota

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.