← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harley Garrioch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-04-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 62 3 7 10 0.161 0.0311 0.0350 0.1017 0.1145
2005-06 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0193 0.0207 0.0630 0.0677
2006-07 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 50 3 10 13 0.260 0.0501 0.0515 0.1639 0.1685
2007-08 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 52 1 16 17 0.327 0.0838 0.0823 0.2423 0.2379
2008-09 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 41 6 19 25 0.610 0.1562 0.1456 0.4519 0.4211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2010-11 Neumann D3 MAC SO 28 2 4 6 0.214
2009-10 Neumann D3 FR 17 0 3 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2009-10 · Neumann
+55.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12582
Defenseman overall
#1330
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.