IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Philippe Lalonde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1162 0.5892 0.5802
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 40 6 3 9 0.225 0.0799 0.0781 0.2362 0.2309
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC — 15 0 4 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Williams
+233.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42605
Forward overall
#2755
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Stirling
Connecticut College · 2016-17
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Turner Richards
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Whited
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.