IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Orlowsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-27 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.1685 0.1760 0.8581 0.8963
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 45 4 2 6 0.133 0.0786 0.0783 0.4004 0.3989
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42592
Forward overall
#1837
Forward born in 2007
#3631
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Philip Tresca
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.24
actual FR PPG at Harvard
William Hughes
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.06
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Cameron Johnson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Thomas
Hamline · 2020-21
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Hennessy
Johnson & Wales · 2021-22
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Craig
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.