← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Orlowsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-27 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.1685 0.1760 0.8573 0.8955
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 45 4 2 6 0.133 0.0786 0.0783 0.4000 0.3985
2026-27 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43065
Forward overall
#1900
Forward born in 2007
#3878
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.36
actual FR PPG at Harvard
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Harvard
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.06
actual FR PPG at Harvard
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.