← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Lock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-15 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 27 2 2 4 0.148 0.0874 0.0919 0.4448 0.4676
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 20 9 29 0.518 0.3055 0.3064 1.5555 1.5601
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24797
Forward overall
#788
Forward born in 2007
#2395
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
WHL 2022-23
0.21
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2017-18
0.29
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.