← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-13 Country: USA
Minnesota Duluth
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 54 3 10 13 0.241 0.1420 0.1475 0.7229 0.7509
2025-26 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 62 6 37 43 0.694 0.4091 0.4052 2.0829 2.0631
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4437
Defenseman overall
#637
Defenseman born in 2007
#2054
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Duluth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.39
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
WHL 2022-23
0.53
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2020-21
0.40
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2014-15
0.42
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.