IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 31 10 10 20 0.645 0.1653 0.1611 0.4864 0.4739
2011-12 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 57 18 18 36 0.632 0.1618 0.1489 0.4761 0.4381
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA — 28 2 7 9 0.321
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 2 10 12 0.462
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA — 27 8 8 16 0.593
2012-13 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 23 4 2 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2012-13 · Norwich
+98.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33410
Forward overall
#1167
Forward born in 1991
#721
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Small
Amherst · 2024-25
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew McCann
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Curran
University of New England · 2021-22
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.