IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Szerlip Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 54 7 6 13 0.241 0.0617 0.0600 0.1814 0.1765
2011-12 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 54 7 12 19 0.352 0.0902 0.0829 0.2653 0.2437
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE — 26 4 5 9 0.346
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC — 24 5 4 9 0.375
2012-13 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA — 24 5 4 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2012-13 · Concordia
+494.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#48352
Forward overall
#1749
Forward born in 1991
#1535
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Gullo
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Garvey
Concordia · 2016-17
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stuckless
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.