IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 49 20 33 53 1.082 0.2651 0.2639 0.7438 0.7405
2007-08 — OJHL 46 13 22 35 0.761 0.1865 0.1773 0.5233 0.4974
2008-09 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 51 18 26 44 0.863 0.2114 0.1901 0.5933 0.5335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 13 3 0 3 0.231
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 24 5 10 15 0.625
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 20 4 2 6 0.300
2009-10 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2009-10 · Hobart
-33.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19618
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 1988
#753
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua McCully
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.