← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaeden Hawkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-25 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 58 21 24 45 0.776 0.4577 0.4399 2.3282 2.2375
2025-26 London Knights OHL 61 9 14 23 0.377 0.2181 0.1984 0.9871 0.8981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 St. Thomas D1 CCHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14209
Forward overall
#693
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.19
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.53
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.