← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Marcuz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Ajax Attack OJHL 40 14 18 32 0.800 0.1961 0.1987 0.5476 0.5549
2008-09 OJHL 36 10 10 20 0.556 0.1362 0.1310 0.3803 0.3659
2009-10 OJHL 49 18 28 46 0.939 0.2301 0.2093 0.6426 0.5845
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 17 7 11 18 1.059
2012-13 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 24 9 15 24 1.000
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 25 4 6 10 0.400
2010-11 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 2 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2010-11 · SUNY Morrisville
+31.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22903
Forward overall
#760
Forward born in 1989
#1018
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.