← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Niedermayer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 18 1 10 11 0.611 0.2276 0.2276 0.8904 0.8904
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 43 4 14 18 0.419 0.1559 0.1655 0.6099 0.6475
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 46 5 20 25 0.543 0.2025 0.2051 0.7919 0.8019
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 6 19 25 0.446 0.2744 0.2441 1.3152 1.1702
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC 27 2 8 10 0.370
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC 19 0 4 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Arizona State
+17.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5374
Defenseman overall
#1370
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.