← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Cummings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 47 6 2 8 0.170 0.0518 0.0537 0.1261 0.1307
2014-15 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 54 11 28 39 0.722 0.2200 0.2165 0.5352 0.5267
2015-16 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 50 8 16 24 0.480 0.1462 0.1367 0.3557 0.3326
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 SR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 SR 15 1 1 2 0.133
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 JR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 JR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 SO 11 4 6 10 0.909
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 FR 20 3 3 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+107.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36974
Forward overall
#1532
Forward born in 1995
#1086
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.