IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.R. Wojciechowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 47 2 3 5 0.106 0.0273 0.0273 0.0802 0.0801
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 4 7 11 0.234 0.0657 0.0635 0.1924 0.1859
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nazareth D1 UCHC SR 28 5 15 20 0.714
2018-19 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 28 5 15 20 0.714
2017-18 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2016-17 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 26 2 8 10 0.385
2015-16 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2015-16 · Nazareth
+800.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25753
Defenseman overall
#2474
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Phil Parker
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elijah Clow
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
P.J. Heger
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.