| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 39 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.051 | 0.0203 | 0.0224 | 0.0539 | 0.0594 |
| 2022-23 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 56 | 3 | 14 | 17 | 0.304 | 0.1203 | 0.1267 | 0.3187 | 0.3357 |
| 2023-24 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 57 | 18 | 21 | 39 | 0.684 | 0.2711 | 0.2726 | 0.7183 | 0.7223 |
| 2024-25 | Tri-City Storm | USHL | 61 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.361 | 0.2217 | 0.2015 | 1.0627 | 0.9660 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Western Michigan | D1 | NCHC | FR | 35 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0.171 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.