IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kurt Sonne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Estevan Bruins SJHL 53 11 8 19 0.358 0.1036 0.1040 0.2699 0.2709
2015-16 Winkler Flyers MJHL 56 9 38 47 0.839 0.2374 0.2249 0.5288 0.5010
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Northland D3 — SR 27 14 10 24 0.889
2018-19 Northland D3 — JR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2017-18 Northland D3 — SO 25 5 10 15 0.600
2016-17 Northland D3 — FR 26 4 9 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Northland
+230.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22579
Forward overall
#897
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Timpano
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Diamond
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.