← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Glance Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-23 Country: USA
Top 16 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 51 14 15 29 0.569 0.4226 0.4424 2.1321 2.2318
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 63 24 33 57 0.905 0.6725 0.6672 3.3928 3.3658
2026-27 Saint John Sea Dogs QMJHL 6 1 6 7 1.167 0.5732 0.5732 3.1146 3.1146
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
70%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4146
Forward overall
#16
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ Boston College (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SuperElit 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2021-22
0.82
actual FR PPG at Boston University
USHL 2014-15
0.41
actual FR PPG at Boston University
WHL 2024-25
0.47
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.