← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Christ Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-22 Country: USA
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chanhassen USHS-MN 26 11 13 24 0.923 0.1169 0.1169 0.2242 0.2242
2022-23 Chanhassen USHS-MN 28 20 25 45 1.607 0.2035 0.2035 0.3904 0.3904
2023-24 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 23 4 10 14 0.609 0.2236 0.2411 0.6425 0.6927
2024-25 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 49 9 8 17 0.347 0.2046 0.2008 1.0419 1.0227
2025-26 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 61 16 18 34 0.557 0.3288 0.3069 1.6741 1.5624
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18118
Forward overall
#966
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.25
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2015-16
0.18
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2018-19
0.18
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2018-19
1.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.