← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Stuart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-23 Country: USA
2026 · Round 7, Pick #208  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 56 11 19 30 0.536 0.3982 0.4085 2.0088 2.0606
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 58 11 20 31 0.534 0.3973 0.3858 2.0043 1.9464
2026-27 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 6 3 3 6 1.000 0.4865 0.4865 2.4427 2.4427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10890
Forward overall
#141
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHL 2023-24
0.36
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHL 2024-25
0.41
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHL 2020-21
0.93
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.