IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Stuart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-23 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — NTDP-U18 56 11 19 30 0.536 0.4261 0.4371 2.0063 2.0581
2025-26 — NTDP-U18 51 8 18 26 0.510 0.4055 0.3938 1.9093 1.8541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6180
Forward overall
#90
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Hagen Burrows
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at Denver
Alex Weiermair
NTDP-U18 2022-23
0.25
actual FR PPG at Denver
Brendan McMorrow
USHL 2023-24
0.41
actual FR PPG at Denver
Jared Wright
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.35
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Tarantino
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kennedy
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.353 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.