| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Collingwood Blues | OJHL | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.105 | 0.0258 | 0.0286 | 0.0725 | 0.0803 |
| 2005-06 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 35 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.371 | 0.0910 | 0.0974 | 0.2556 | 0.2735 |
| 2006-07 | Wellington Dukes | OJHL | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2500 | 0.6883 | 0.7020 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.