← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason West Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-03 Country: USA
2025 · Round 1, Pick #29  ·  Chicago Blackhawks Chicago Blackhawks
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Edina USHS-MN 30 9 18 27 0.900 0.1139 0.1139 0.2186 0.2186
2023-24 Edina USHS-MN 30 15 23 38 1.267 0.1604 0.1604 0.3077 0.3077
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 10 1 8 9 0.900 0.5309 0.5639 2.7031 2.8712
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 38 10 15 25 0.658 0.3881 0.3935 1.9759 2.0033
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7034
Forward overall
#126
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
BCHL 2014-15
0.71
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
SuperElit 2017-18
0.22
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
USHL 2017-18
0.15
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.