← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Marthaler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-10 Country: USA
Minnesota Duluth
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Superior (Wis.) USHS-MN 14 4 5 9 0.643 0.0814 0.0814 0.1562 0.1562
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 1 9 10 0.182 0.1351 0.1372 0.6784 0.6891
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 56 0 5 5 0.089 0.0664 0.0638 0.3332 0.3202
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17717
Defenseman overall
#949
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Duluth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
NAHL 2020-21
0.54
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2007-08
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2012-13
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.