← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Marthaler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-10 Country: USA
Minnesota Duluth
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Superior (Wis.) USHS-MN 14 4 5 9 0.643 0.0814 0.0814 0.1561 0.1561
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 1 9 10 0.182 0.1351 0.1372 0.6817 0.6925
2025-26 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 56 0 5 5 0.089 0.0664 0.0638 0.3349 0.3219
2026-27 Oshawa Generals OHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0827 0.0827 0.3742 0.3742
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17947
Defenseman overall
#1060
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota Duluth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.54
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at Minnesota Duluth

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2002-03
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2004-05
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.